United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
New Mexico Go to Accessibility Information
Skip to Page Content

 


2007 Environmental Quality Incentive Program

Local Work Group Summary for Los Lunas

Introduction:

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Los Lunas Field Office is located in the west-central part of New Mexico. The office is bordered by Socorro County on the south, Cibola County and Lucero uplift to the west, on the east by the Cibola National Forest and Torrance County and on the north by Bernalillo County. Los Lunas, is the county seat of Valencia County, is on the Rio Grande and is about 11 miles north of Belen. The office encompasses l.46 million acres, which includes Valencia County, portions of five other counties: Bernalillo, Cibola, Sandoval, Socorro, and Torrance.

The elevation within the field office ranges from 4,700 feet at the Rio Grande Valley to about l0, 000 feet a the crest of the Manzano Mountains. Soils vary from shallow to deep, depending on the alluvial materials.

They range in texture from sand to clay and are generally calcareous. The depth of the water table from the surface varies from a few inches to a few feet, therefore, this depth should be considered for any agricultural undertaking as well as current urbanization in the Rio Grande flood plain area.

The annual rainfall is very limited in the lower elevations, about eight inches to about l2 inches in the higher elevations. Forty percent of the rainfall comes during the months of July, August, and September.

The growing season averages l83 days. The average date of last killing frost is April 20; average date of first killing frost is October 20. Average lake evaporation is 60 inches per year.

The principal urban centers are: The Village of Bosque Farms; the Village of Los Lunas; and the City of Belen. Also included in this field office boundaries are the Isleta and Laguna American Indian Pueblos.

Local Work Group:

Membership on the EQIP Local Work Group includes SWCD supervisors, Farm Service Agency County Committee, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish & Wildlife, N.M. Game & Fish, N. M. State Engineer, Forest Service, Manzano District, N.M. Dept. of Environment, Southern Pueblo Agency, State Land Office, Valencia County Commissioner, Pueblo of Laguna, and Pueblo of Isleta.

The Local Work Group met August 2, 2006.  They discussed and outlined EQIP resource priorities for FY 2007.  Other topics were cost share rates, ranking, eligible practices and funding allocations.

Priority Resource Concerns:

The local work group discussed and outlined the following resource concerns to be addressed under the EQIP 2005 program:

  • Water concerns (water quantity and water quality)
  • Dairies (water quality and nutrient management concerns)
  • Grazing land
  • Noxious weeds
  • Salt Cedar control
  • Well Head protection
  • Wildlife

Funding Consideration: 

The local work group recommended that 2006 EQIP funding allocation for the Los Lunas area field should target resource concerns as follows:

  • 60% Irrigated land

  • 25% Rangeland

  • 10% AFO/CAFO

  • 2.5% Dryland

  • 2.5% Woodland

  • 10% Tribal (from total funding percentage)

Cost Docket:

Please refer to the links for the cost docket and eligible practices to view the final approved practices, cost share rates and practice component costs.

Eligible Practices:

For EQIP 2007 the LWG recommended that all previous FY 2006 cost share practices be accepted. 

Please refer to the links for the cost docket and eligible practices to view the final approved practices, cost share rates and practice component costs.

Cost Share Rates, Incentive Payments and Caps:

The LWG recommended all high value irrigation practices (land leveling, pipeline, hi-flow turnouts, concrete-ditch lining, etc.) be cost shared at 65%.  They recommended 75% for drip irrigation.  The LWG strongly believes that if these practices are kept lower than 65% most of the applicants will not be able to install these practices on their own.  Regarding other practices, including AFO/CAFO and grazing land practices, the LWG continued to express concern that if too much funding goes to these applicants with high cost practices, then fewer farmers can participate in the program.  Therefore, the recommendation is to keep these practices at 50% cost share.

A per practice financial assistance cap of $50,000 has been established for AFO related practices.  A per practice financial assistance cap has been established for sprinkler irrigation  and micro-irrigation systems.  The LWG did not recommend incentive payments for any land management practices.

Please refer to the links for the cost docket and eligible practices to view the final approved practices, cost share rates and practice component costs.

Ranking Criteria:

Local issues will be prepared for incorporation into the new ranking tool.

In the event two or more applications under the ‘Irrigated Cropland’ category initially receive the same amount of points, ties will be broken by re-evaluating and comparing the potential increase in irrigation efficiency (using FIRS), in 1% increments.

Please refer to the ranking criteria links to view the final approved criteria.

Timelines, Evaluation Periods:

All applications and any supporting documentation must be submitted by November 3, 2006.

< Back to EQIP County Documents