2003 Environmental Quality Incentive
Program
Local Work Group Summary for Silver City
Introduction:
The Silver City Field Office is located in the town of Silver City, county
seat of Grant County, in the southwestern part of New Mexico. The field office
provides assistance to the Grant and San Francisco Soil and Water Conservation
Districts (SWCD) with a combined total of 4.3 million acres. Approximately 35%
are state and private lands and 65% federal lands. There are a wide variety of
landscapes ranging from 4,400 feet up to 11,000 feet in elevation. Annual
precipitation ranges from 10 inches in the southern desert to over 20 inches in
the mountains. Soils are extremely variable and complex. They range from deep
loamy soils in the two major river valleys and broad alluvial slopes to shallow
rocky soils in the foothills and mountains. Vegetation ranges from the black
grama, tobosa and dropseeds, yucca, Mormon tea, and mesquite of the desert
grassland type up to Ponderosa pine, piņon, ricegrass, mountain brome and
mountain muhly of the Ponderosa Pine type. The present economy of the area is
based on agriculture with less emphasis on the mining and logging activities of
the past.
Local Work Group:
The Grant and San Francisco SWCDs held a combined Local Work Group Meeting
February 26, 2003, at 6:00 PM, at the Red Barn Family Steakhouse in Silver City,
New Mexico. Invitations were sent out to federal, state, and local agencies.
Fourteen participants were in attendance and provided input in developing the
plan.
Priority Resource Concerns:
The Local Work Group selected soil erosion, water quality, and water quantity
as higher priority resource concerns and proposes to recommend higher cost-share
rates for selected practices to accomplish their objectives. The local work
group does not intend to limit landowners from addressing other resource
concerns utilizing the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). This
represents the results of a district mailing to cooperators and a tabulation of
the feedback comments.
Funding Considerations:
The Local Work Group decided to allocate monies received to the two districts
based on the same acreage figures used to determine the state allocation to the
Silver City Field Office. Initially, both districts would use 55% of the
available funds for rangeland practices and 45% for all other practices. These
funds are interchangeable if not otherwise obligated. Unobligated funds within
the districts are also interchangeable.
Cost Docket:
The Grant County Cost Docket was reviewed and accepted. One addition is
recommended based on cost information as attached to the 2003 Component Cost
Verification Certification previously submitted. The Local Work Group recommends
that a component cost for 580-Streambank and Shoreline Protection be added as
follows: Erosion Control/Posts, Wire, Cable, etc at $18.00AM per liner foot.
Contracts within the San Francisco SWCD will be developed using the Catron
County Cost Docket.
Practices to be Eligible: Refer to Eligible Practices...
Cost Share Rate and Incentive Payments:
The Local Work Group, in making their recommendations, utilized the results
of a mailing to cooperators within the area as to their resource concerns and
the conservation practices needed to address these concerns. The Local Work
Group decided to try and promote the use of these practices by increasing the
cost share rates as incentive for cooperators experiencing drought conditions,
poor cattle markets, and a depressed economy. It is felt that with most
rangeland practices, the benefits received from the installation of these
practices come over a long period of time. Providing this additional incentive
should help to address the resource concerns that otherwise might not get done.
The Local Work Group recommends an incentive payment for prescribed grazing
in association with a prescribed burn. The
payment would be based on a need to defer the pasture from all
grazing by domestic animals during the growing season and the following months
prior to the planned burn in order to have sufficient fine fuels to carry a
prescribed fire. Payments would be made on an animal unit month (aum) basis for
the acreage to be burned covering the period of the growing season through the
month of the actual burn. This is generally July through April or May of the
following year. Payment would be made upon the completion of the prescribed
burn. The Local Work Group suggests using the rates presently used by the USDA
Forest Service in this same area. The Animal Unit Month Value Coefficients used
in estimating market values for private lands has been used since 1983 and is
updated annually. The calendar year 2003 coefficient for this area is $8.28 per
AUM (Region 3 of the attachment). The coefficient in effect at the time the
contract is written would lock in the price for the period of the contract.
Ranking Criteria:
The New Mexico - Silver City Field Office, FY 2003 Ranking Criteria Worksheet
- Grazing Lands will be used including attachment for riparian and grazed forest
if needed (see attachment 2). The New Mexico - Silver City Field Office, FY 2003
Ranking Criteria Worksheet - Irrigated Cropland will be used as appropriate (see
attachment 3). The Ranking Criteria Worksheet is used to rank each application
impartially and prioritize the applications for available funding to be
contracted.
Timelines, Evaluation Periods:
Contracts are to be signed by July 3, 2003. Applications are taken on a
continuous basis. The batching period for this FY 2003 program ended March 14,
2003. No additional batching periods are planned for this program year.
< Back to EQIP County
Documents
|