2003 Environmental Quality Incentive
Program
Local Work Group Summary for Tucumcari
Introduction:
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Tucumcari Field Office is located on the East Central side of the state
in Quay County and covers two conservation districts. The agricultural setting
of Quay County includes about 87% Rangeland, 3% Irrigated Cropland, and 10% Dry
Cropland.
Local Work Group:
The Local Work Group meeting for the Tucumcari Field Office was held on March
27, 2003. This Work Group was lead by the Canadian River Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) and the Southwest Quay Soil and Water Conservation
District. Members that attended include:
| Name |
Agency |
City or County |
|
Dawn Davis |
NM Department of Game and Fish |
Clovis |
|
Walter F. Glover |
Farm Service Agency (FSA) |
Clovis (District 3) |
|
Ken Walker |
NRCS Team Leader |
Clovis |
|
Jim Norris |
NRCS |
Tucumcari |
|
Erik Nelson |
State Land Office |
Clovis |
|
Lem Chesher |
NRCS |
Tucumcari |
|
Relissa Nials |
NRCS |
Tucumcari |
|
Debbie Kanapilly |
FSA |
Tucumcari |
|
Rhonda Mitchell |
FSA |
Quay/Harding |
|
Don Gunn |
Southwest Quay SWCD |
Melrose |
|
Leonard Lauriault |
NMSU Ag Science Center |
Tucumcari |
|
Evelyn Massey |
Canadian River SWCD |
Tucumcari |
|
Carrie Lindsey |
Southwest Quay SWCD |
Grady |
|
Bob Bruce |
El Llano Estacado RC&D |
Tucumcari |
|
Glenn Briscoe |
Canadian River SWCD |
Quay |
|
Richard Bull |
NRCS |
Tucumcari |
Priority Resource Concerns:
The Priority Resource Concerns include Rangeland, Dry Cropland, Irrigated
Cropland, and Buffers.
BUFFER RESOURCE CONCERN
The Local Work Group for Quay County proposed that a resource concern for
tree plantings be considered for the area. Tree and shrub plantings are
important to the work plans of both District Boards which are in Quay County.
However, some projects may not receive consideration in the normal concern areas
due to limitations in funding and other hindrances. In some cases, the plantings
may impact areas used for the production of agricultural products but may not be
on the areas such as farmstead windbreaks and woody plant proposals. They may
not be eligible for WHIP for various reasons. However, wildlife will be impacted
by these areas and in some cases, species at risk may be present. Windbreaks and
tree plantings may not be carried out as much as is desirable if some incentive
is not present to interest land users. Therefore, it is the recommendation of
the Local Work Group (LWG) that this Special Emphasis Area be included in the
Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) for Quay
County.
Funding Considerations:
The funding was allocated as:
- 62% to Rangeland
- 23% to Irrigated Cropland
- 10% to Dry Cropland
- 5% to Buffers
Cost Docket: Refer to Cost Docket
Practices to be Eligible: Refer to Eligible Practices...
Cost Share Rate and Incentive Payments:
TREE PLANTING: 380, 612, 650: LWG recommended that all tree plantings be cost
shared at 75% rate. This practice is a high priority item with both district
boards in Quay County. Tree plantings are important to a great many resource
concerns. Wildlife will benefit from the planting of trees and shrubs. Soil
erosion will be reduced on cropland and other land uses from the implementation
of windbreaks. The LWG feels that the tree planting practices will not be
utilized to the extent necessary to impact these concerns at anything less than
if the cost share rate is set at 75% of the actual cost not to exceed the
maximum listed cost. In addition, the LWG will recommend in a separate part of
this proposal that money be used for a buffer or windbreak special emphasis
project.
RANGE SEEDING: 550: LWG recommended that Range Seedings be cost shared at 75%
rate. Range seeding is a high impact practice in both districts and both
Districts have made it a priority. All soils in the county are classed as highly
erodible and without cover, erosion is severe. Wildlife will be benefited by
planting wildlife friendly species of grass and native plants. The cost of
carrying out a seeding practice is high and without added incentive, not many
customers who need this practice will be inclined to carry it out. In order to
increase the number of acres that are converted to less erodible cover, the
higher rate is recommended.
DIVERSIONS AND TERRACES: 600, 362, 356: LWG recommends that the cost share
rate for diversions and terraces be set at 65%. Water erosion is a severe
problem in the county. The cost of earthwork is high as no contractors are close
by. In addition, this is a cost to the producer which will not be offset by an
increase in profitability. In order to encourage producers to use these
extremely beneficial practices, the higher rate is recommended. Not much
earthwork has been carried out recently due to high cost and the added incentive
would increase the interest. This would be the only way that the amount of these
practices would be increased.
BRUSH MANAGEMENT: 314: Brush management is a high impact practice in this
area. Brush, particularly mesquite, is increasing in the area and many acres of
land are being reduced in production due to this invasion. In addition, it has
been shown that management of brush improves the underground aquifers where it
is carried out. Also, wildlife habitat will be improved when management is
performed. The cost of management is high and in many case not much profit will
be realized from the performance of the practice. Most producers will be
discouraged from doing it unless the incentive is high enough to help them.
There fore the LWG recommends that the rate be set at 65%.
Timelines, Evaluation Periods:
The deadline for accepting applications for FY 2003 was March
14, 2003. Applications will be ranked as proposals are approved. EQIP Funds will
be obligated by July 3, 2003.
< Back to EQIP County
Documents
|