2004 Environmental Quality Incentive
Program
Local Work Group Summary for Socorro
Introduction:
The Socorro Field Office serves the Socorro Soil and Water Conservation
District which is located close to the geographic middle of New Mexico. The
great majority of the irrigated land lies within the floodplain of the Rio
Grande. Virtually all of this land is surface irrigated from MRGCD canals and
ditches. One legally recognized acequia is located on the East side of the Rio
Grande and South of US 60. All of its lands are also surface irrigated from a
main ditch which is owned and maintained by the respective acequia. There are
several vineyards located outside of the floodplain which are drip irrigated.
Approximately 75% of the irrigated land is considered hayland. Irrigated
pasture, chili, oats and corn are some of the other crops which are grown on the
irrigated lands. All of the irrigated land is in the “SD” MLRA The Socorro FO
has over 1 million acres of native grazing lands. Land ownership is
characterized by intermingled deeded, state and federal lands. All of the
grazing lands lie within the SD, WP or CP MLRA’s.
Local Work Group
Membership of the Local Work Group (LWG) consists of local
officials of the following entities:
- Bureau of Land Management
- Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District
- NM State Land Office
- Socorro County Commission
- Socorro Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD)Board
- Socorro County Ag Extension Service
- Socorro County FSA Committee
- Socorro SWCD District Program Manager
- NM Game and Fish Dept
- NM Environment Department
- Bosque Del Apache National Wildlife Refuge
- Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other Entities include:
- US Fish and Wildlife Service
- NM Department of Agriculture Field Representative
District Conservationists from adjoining field offices are also invited to
the local meetings in order to facilitate coordination of ranking criteria and
cost-share rates etc..
The LWG meeting was held on January 17, 2004 in order discuss and develop the
2004 EQIP program.
Priority Resource Concerns
National Priorities were identified and discussed
at the LWG meeting. The LWG agreed that these were all priorities that would be
addressed with the implementation of this years program. Local priorities and
concerns to be addressed were identified as:
-Water conservation on irrigated cropland and
rangeland.
-Soil erosion on
rangeland.
-Water quality on rangeland, irrigated cropland, and groundwater related to
animal feeding operations.
Funding Considerations
The LWG divided the funding as follows:
- AFO’s – actual amount allocated to Socorro FO for AFO’s from statewide
formula will be used for funding applications from AFO’s.
- Funds received from rangeland and irrigated cropland will be added
together and then split between the two land uses with approximately 67%
going to irrigated cropland and 33% going to rangeland.
- These proportions may vary depending on the actual amount of money needed
to fully fund the highest ranking grazing land or water resources contracts.
Cost Docket - Please refer to the Cost Docket link for specific information.
Eligible Practices - Please refer to the Eligible Practices link for
specific information.
All practices not pertaining to Ag Waste Structures are eligible. For AFO
contracts, only “Waste Treatment Lagoons” – 359, “Pond Sealing or Lining –
Flexible Membrane” and related components for each practice are eligible for
cost share.
Cost Share Rate and Incentive Payments - Please refer to the link for
specific information.
All eligible practices will be cost-shared at 50%. No incentive payments are
eligible. This rate and decision not to make incentive payments was recommended
by a consensus of the local work group. A $50,000 limit was
recommended for each respective practice for each
contract.
Ranking Criteria - Please refer to the Ranking Criteria links for specific
information.
The LWG recommends that the ranking criteria worksheet provided for 2004
will be used for Grazing Lands. The concerns and conservation practices and
points identified under conservation practices in the Grazing Lands Ranking
Criteria will reflect what was shown in the 2003 ranking criteria. It also
recommends that the 2004 ranking criteria worksheet for Irrigated Cropland be
used. However it recommends that section A under “Water Quality” be changed to
reflect what was used last year concerning the presence of field drains. This
would more accurately reflect local conditions. The practices and points
identified under section 3, “Selected Conservation Practices” will also reflect
what was shown in the 2003 ranking criteria worksheet. The LWG is proposing to
change the ranking criteria for AFO’s slightly in order to reflect local
conditions. Section E under “Manure Utilization” will be changed to show
“Evaporative System”. Applicants will be awarded points for either A-D or just
E, but not both. Recommended points for each section for each respective Ranking
Criteria Worksheet is shown on each respective worksheet. The proposed ranking
criteria worksheets are attached.
The following criteria will be used to break ties which may occur when
ranking applicants for each respective resource concern.
- Irrigated Cropland
- highest change in efficiency
- distance to ground water
- distance to surface water
- Grazing Land
- percent change in trend in down to upward trend of contracted
area.
biggest upward change in similiarity index of contracted
area.
highest percent of deeded land compared to state and federal land in
contracted area.
- Animal Feeding Operations
- depth to ground water
- exact distance to surface water
Timelines, Evaluation Periods:
Please refer to the EQIP Application Information link.
< Back to EQIP County
Documents |